What tighter gun laws would stop a terrorist mr obama? How will making the ownership of weapons for law-abiding Americans stop criminals and terrorists who couldn’t careless about the law? Face is there is no law that will stop a mass killing let alone a terrorist attack. What more does obama, democrats and the anti-gun lobby want?
They wanted background checks, they got them.
They wanted waiting periods, they got them.
They wanted Gun Free Zones, they got them.
They wanted magazine restrictions, they got them.
In almost every case the left gets what it wants on gun control except for a few like outright bans or laws that were so broad anyone could be denied their rights. But that hasn’t stopped legislators, look at CA, NJ, NY and many other states that have clearly infringed on the Second Amendment slowly, methodically chipping away individuals gun rights. These people have but one goal complete and total disarmament of the American people. If they can’t take all the guns away they will make it impossible to buy and use them in the future. Many states like CA are passing retroactive laws to turn what was once legal illegal. Some are looking into ammunition restrictions, taxes, fees, special licensing or even the idea of making gun owners purchase extremely high priced insurance.
Blaming guns, gun owners and the NRA is like punishing a rape victim for being raped. This nonsense has to stop because as many gun control advocates have admitted, from the WH Press Sec to Mark Kelly (Rep Gabby Giffords husband), NO LAW COULD STOP mass killings!
If the left would focus it’s energy on the real problems of islamic radicals, the mentally and just enforcing the laws already on the books we probably wouldn’t have so many problems. The fact they won’t is proof they don’t really care and are just using terrorism and mass killings as a means to advance their anti-Second Amendment agenda.